杂志简称：neurophysiology+
中文译名：《神经生理学》
收录属性：scie（2024版）, 英文期刊,
投稿方向：医学、neurosciences神经科学、physiology生理学
SCI/E期刊基本信息
出版周期：双月刊 地区：乌克兰
中科院分区：4区
是否TOP：非TOP期刊
是否综述：非综述期刊
是否OA：非OA期刊
国际标准刊号：ISSN 0090-2977/EISSN 1573-9007
杂志语言：英语
出版国家：乌克兰
杂志官网 联系方式
出版地址：ONE NEW YORK PLAZA,SUITE 4600 ,NEW YORK,United States,NY,10004
杂志邮箱：
传真：（38044）256 20 00
杂志官方网址：https://www.springer.com/journal/11062
出版商网址：https://www.springer.com/
杂志投稿要求
投稿须知
【杂志社官方网站信息】
Submission guidelines
Instructions for Authors
MANUSCRIPT SUBMISSION
Both experimental papers covering relatively extensive problems or separate interesting observations/findings and review papers dealing with modern neuroscience problems can be submitted. An upper limit of the dimension of the experimental paper is 16 double-spaced typed pages (1,800 symbols each). This includes References but does not include Legends for Figures and Tables. Maximum, eight illustration units (Figures and/or Tables) can be included in the experimental papers. The maximum volume of a review paper is 30 typed pages; several illustrations can be included in such a paper.
No papers dealing exclusively with methods can be submitted.
American spelling and terminology should be used.
CONTACT
Editorial Board of Neurophysiology/Neirofiziologiya
Bogomolets Institute of Physiology
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Bogomolets Street 4
01024 Kyiv
UKRAINE
Tel.: (+38044) 256-20-63, (+38050) 984-63-74
E-mail: neu-nei@yahoo.com, neph@biph.kiev.ua
ARRANGEMENT OF THE MANUSCRIPT
The standard order of the manuscript, with all correctly numbered pages should be as follows:
Author's (Authors') Name (Names)
Title
Author Affiliation
Summary
Keywords (up to six)
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION (the latter two sections could be combined in a RESULTS AND
DISCUSSION section)
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES
Figures and legends
Tables (with their titles and footnotes)
Note that the Author's affiliation (the academic or professional address of the author) should be complete and include a detailed name of the Institution, postal address, telephone, and e-mail address for correspondence and proofs, with indication by the corresponding figure (superscript one, superscript two, etc.) near the Author's (co-Author's) name. In the Summary (it should not be provided with a special section's title), the Author must briefly (up to one page of standard typed text, 1800 symbols) describe most important results of the study and main conclusions.
Keywords should be given as a separate line below Summary.
References should include only the articles that have been published.
Unpublished data, submitted manuscripts, or personal communications should be cited only in the text [e.g., unpublished results may be mentioned with the word (unpublished) in parentheses after the author's name].
References should be listed in the numerical sequence, i.e.,in the order of their citing in the text (not in the alphabetic order!).
Include only those references that have been cited in the text. Reference citations in the text should be presented as numbers in square brackets, e.g., depending on the construction of the sentence; the citation will appear as Smith and Jones [1] or simply [1].
Please use the following style for the References:
Journal papers
1. W. Van der Kloot and J. Molgo, “Qantal acetylcholine release at the vertebrate neuromuscular junction,” Physiol. Rev., 74, No. 4, 899-991 (1994).
2. S. Mathias, L. A. Pena, and R. N. Kolesnick, “Signal transduction of stress via ceramide,” Biochem. J., 335, Part 3, 465-480 (1998).
3. R. Bridi, F. P. Crossetti, V. M. Steffen, and A. T. Henriques, “The antioxidant activity of standardized extract of Ginkgo biloba (EGb 761) in rats,” Phytother. Res., 15, 449-451 (2201).
4. N. Harata, J. Katayama, Y. Takeshita, et al., “Two components of metabotropic glutamate responses in acutely dissociated CA3 pyramidal neurons of the rat,” Brain Res., 711, Nos. 1/2, 323-333 (1996).
5. O. L. Zaika, O. M. Pochynyuk, and E. A. Lukyanetz, “Electrochemical studies of catecholamines-induced secretion from individual vesicles of rat chromaffin cells,” Ukr. Biokhim. Zh., 73, No. 3, 69-72 (2001).
Books
1. R. Frank, Electrical Nerve Stimulation. Theory, Experiments and Applications, New York (1990).
2. Arterial Hypertension – Medical and Social Problem (Methodical Manual of the Strazhesko Institute of Cardiology of the Acad. Sci. of Ukraine) [in Ukrainian], Vipol, Kyiv (2002).
3. V. Skok and A. Ivanov, Natural Activity of Autonomic Ganglia [in Russian], Naukova Dumka, Kyiv (1989).
Chapters in books
. Bragin, and V. S. Stafekhina, “Participation of graft and host brain dendrites in the establishment of interconnections,” in: Progress in Brain
Research, Vol. 82, Chap. 31, S. B. Dunnett and S.-J. Richards (eds.), Elsevier, Amsterdam (1990), pp. 277-286.
2. G. Sieck and Y. Prakash, “Fatigue at the neuromuscular junction,” in: Fatigue, A. Gandevia et al. (eds.), Plenum Press, New York (1995), pp. 83-100.
3. W. D. Hirst, K. A. Young, E. Solito, and G. P. Wilkin, “Secretion of lipocortin-1 from activated microglia in the damaged central nervous system,” in: Proceedings of 3rd European Meeting on Glial Cell Function in Health and Disease (Athens, May 6-10, 1998), Athens (1998), p. 96.
The SI system of units should be used and maintained throughout the manuscript, including illustrations and tables. The molar concentrations should be indicated as M, mM, and μM but not in mole/liter, etc.
in the case where the earlier published figures should be urgently presented, please use, e.g., (i) Fig. 1 from Zhao et al. [2], or (ii) A and B fragments were taken from Kertcer [3] and slightly modified.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
This journal is committed to upholding the integrity of the scientific record. As a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) the journal will follow the COPE guidelines on how to deal with potential acts of misconduct.
Authors should refrain from misrepresenting research results which could damage the trust in the journal, the professionalism of scientific authorship, and ultimately the entire scientific endeavour. Maintaining integrity of the research and its presentation is helped by following the rules of good scientific practice, which include*:
The manuscript should not be submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration.
The submitted work should be original and should not have been published elsewhere in any form or language (partially or in full), unless the new work concerns an expansion of previous work. (Please provide transparency on the re-use of material to avoid the concerns about text-recycling (‘self-plagiarism’).
A single study should not be split up into several parts to increase the quantity of submissions and submitted to various journals or to one journal over time (i.e. ‘salami-slicing/publishing’).
Concurrent or secondary publication is sometimes justifiable, provided certain conditions are met. Examples include: translations or a manuscript that is intended for a different group of readers.
Results should be presented clearly, honestly, and without fabrication, falsification or inappropriate data manipulation (including image based manipulation). Authors should adhere to discipline-specific rules for acquiring, selecting and processing data.
No data, text, or theories by others are presented as if they were the author’s own (‘plagiarism’). Proper acknowledgements to other works must be given (this includes material that is closely copied (near verbatim), summarized and/or paraphrased), quotation marks (to indicate words taken from another source) are used for verbatim copying of material, and permissions secured for material that is copyrighted.
Important note: the journal may use software to screen for plagiarism.
Authors should make sure they have permissions for the use of software, questionnaires/(web) surveys and scales in their studies (if appropriate).
Research articles and non-research articles (e.g. Opinion, Review, and Commentary articles) must cite appropriate and relevant literature in support of the claims made. Excessive and inappropriate self-citation or coordinated efforts among several authors to collectively self-cite is strongly discouraged.
Authors should avoid untrue statements about an entity (who can be an individual person or a company) or descriptions of their behavior or actions that could potentially be seen as personal attacks or allegations about that person.
Research that may be misapplied to pose a threat to public health or national security should be clearly identified in the manuscript (e.g. dual use of research). Examples include creation of harmful consequences of biological agents or toxins, disruption of immunity of vaccines, unusual hazards in the use of chemicals, weaponization of research/technology (amongst others).
Authors are strongly advised to ensure the author group, the Corresponding Author, and the order of authors are all correct at submission. Adding and/or deleting authors during the revision stages is generally not permitted, but in some cases may be warranted. Reasons for changes in authorship should be explained in detail. Please note that changes to authorship cannot be made after acceptance of a manuscript.
*All of the above are guidelines and authors need to make sure to respect third parties rights such as copyright and/or moral rights.
Upon request authors should be prepared to send relevant documentation or data in order to verify the validity of the results presented. This could be in the form of raw data, samples, records, etc. Sensitive information in the form of confidential or proprietary data is excluded.
If there is suspicion of misbehavior or alleged fraud the Journal and/or Publisher will carry out an investigation following COPE guidelines. If, after investigation, there are valid concerns, the author(s) concerned will be contacted under their given e-mail address and given an opportunity to address the issue. Depending on the situation, this may result in the Journal’s and/or Publisher’s implementation of the following measures, including, but not limited to:
If the manuscript is still under consideration, it may be rejected and returned to the author.
If the article has already been published online, depending on the nature and severity of the infraction:
– an erratum/correction may be placed with the article
– an expression of concern may be placed with the article
– or in severe cases retraction of the article may occur.
The reason will be given in the published erratum/correction, expression of concern or retraction note. Please note that retraction means that the article is maintained on the platform, watermarked “retracted” and the explanation for the retraction is provided in a note linked to the watermarked article.
The author’s institution may be informed
A notice of suspected transgression of ethical standards in the peer review system may be included as part of the author’s and article’s bibliographic record.
Fundamental errors
Authors have an obligation to correct mistakes once they discover a significant error or inaccuracy in their published article. The author(s) is/are requested to contact the journal and explain in what sense the error is impacting the article. A decision on how to correct the literature will depend on the nature of the error. This may be a correction or retraction. The retraction note should provide transparency which parts of the article are impacted by the error.
Suggesting / excluding reviewers
Authors are welcome to suggest suitable reviewers and/or request the exclusion of certain individuals when they submit their manuscripts. When suggesting reviewers, authors should make sure they are totally independent and not connected to the work in any way. It is strongly recommended to suggest a mix of reviewers from different countries and different institutions. When suggesting reviewers, the Corresponding Author must provide an institutional email address for each suggested reviewer, or, if this is not possible to include other means of verifying the identity such as a link to a personal homepage, a link to the publication record or a researcher or author ID in the submission letter. Please note that the Journal may not use the suggestions, but suggestions are appreciated and may help facilitate the peer review process.
Authorship principles
These guidelines describe authorship principles and good authorship practices to which prospective authors should adhere to.
Authorship clarified
The Journal and Publisher assume all authors agreed with the content and that all gave explicit consent to submit and that they obtained consent from the responsible authorities at the institute/organization where the work has been carried out, before the work is submitted.
The Publisher does not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship. It is recommended that authors adhere to the guidelines for authorship that are applicable in their specific research field. In absence of specific guidelines it is recommended to adhere to the following guidelines*:
All authors whose names appear on the submission
1) made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data; or the creation of new software used in the work;
2) drafted the work or revised it critically for important intellectual content;
3) approved the version to be published; and
4) agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
* Based on/adapted from:
ICMJE, Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors,
Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication, McNutt at all, PNAS February 27, 2018
Disclosures and declarations
All authors are requested to include information regarding sources of funding, financial or non-financial interests, study-specific approval by the appropriate ethics committee for research involving humans and/or animals, informed consent if the research involved human participants, and a statement on welfare of animals if the research involved animals (as appropriate).
The decision whether such information should be included is not only dependent on the scope of the journal, but also the scope of the article. Work submitted for publication may have implications for public health or general welfare and in those cases it is the responsibility of all authors to include the appropriate disclosures and declarations.