杂志简称：ieee t nucl sci
中文译名：《ieee核科学汇刊》
收录属性：高质量科技期刊（t2）, scie（2024版）, 目次收录（维普）, 目次收录（超星）,英文期刊,
自引率：30.10%
投稿方向：工程技术、nuclear science & technology核科学技术、engineering, electrical & electronic工程、电子与电气
SCI/E期刊基本信息
出版周期：月刊 地区：美国
中科院分区：3区
是否TOP：TOP期刊
是否综述：非综述期刊
是否OA：非OA期刊
国际标准刊号：ISSN 0018-9499；EISSN 1558-1578
杂志语言：英语
出版国家：美国
杂志官网 联系方式
出版地址：IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC,445 HOES LANE,PISCATAWAY,USA,NJ,08855-4141
杂志邮箱：
投稿网址：http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tns-ieee
杂志官方网址：https://ieee-npss.org/publications/transactions-on-nuclear-science/
出版商网址：http://www.ieee.org
杂志投稿要求
投稿须知【杂志社官方网站信息】
Journal Scope
The IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science is published monthly. The scope of the IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science includes theory, technology, and application areas related to nuclear science and engineering. It focuses on instrumentation for the detection and measurement of ionizing radiation; materials (including their preparation and characterization) for the detection of ionizing radiation; radiation imaging not related to medicine; particle accelerators and their controls; effects of radiation on materials, components, and systems; reactor instrumentation and controls; measurement of radiation in space and terrestrial environments; and computing applications related to nuclear science. Tutorial and review papers that cover the above subjects are also considered.
Considerations for the Suitability of Manuscripts for TNS
Manuscripts considered for publication should report original contributions to the theories, experimental results, or applications of the fields listed under the Journal Scope above; although papers of a tutorial or historical nature will be considered. IEEE’s policy on duplicate publication states “authors should only submit original work that has neither appeared elsewhere for publication, nor which is under review for another refereed publication. If authors have used their own previously published work(s) as a basis for a new submission, they are required to cite the previous work(s) and very briefly indicate how the new submission offers substantively novel contributions beyond those of the previously published work(s).”
Required Manuscript Content
The work should report new results, new applications, or new developments of interest. The manuscript must provide introductory material and context for the work. It must be clear what is new in the work and how it relates to other work in the field, and related work must be referenced appropriately. Models should be verified by data or some other means. There must be an analysis of data that provides conclusions that are general beyond the specific devices or system studied. The information provided must be sufficient for others to make use of the approach, results, etc. so that the impact is not limited to the particular system or application used in the manuscript.
The paper should be sufficiently complete that others with comparable equipment could repeat the work. Overall the work needs to be of an archival nature (e.g., not only test results on a part that will be obsolete in a couple of years, or analysis of a particular design without illustration of generally applicable principles, or a description of the characteristics of a particular test facility, or an account of the existence and characteristics of a specific commercial product etc.).
Items for Authors to Address Before Submission
Reviewers of TNS manuscripts are requested to evaluate, at a minimum, the items listed below. Authors should be sure that their manuscript suitably addresses all these items before submitting their work to TNS.
1. Background and Context
Is the introductory and background material sufficient for someone not an expert in this area to understand the context and significance of this work?
Has related work been appropriately and adequately referenced?
Is it clear what is new in this work?
Is the relationship between this work and other work in the field adequately described?
Is it described how this work advances the state-of-the art?
2. Technical Quality
Is the work relevant and accurate, free from errors, misconceptions, ambiguities?
Are interpretations/models supported by data?
Is the data analysis complete?
Does the work contain new results, new applications, or new developments of interest?
Is the work of general applicability, i.e. not limited to the particular system or application used in the manuscript?
Are the conclusions significant and well-supported?
3. Clarity and Completeness
Is the work logically developed?
Is the presentation of data and/or modeling clear and easy to follow?
Is the discussion clear and unambiguous?
Is sufficient information provided for an expert reader to understand fully what was done, to repeat the experiment, or to duplicate the results presented?
Is enough detail presented to support the conclusions drawn?
Is the manuscript “complete”, i.e., not requiring extensive reference to other work to permit understanding?
4. Presentation
Are the English grammar and usage satisfactory?
Is the manuscript loosely written or repetitious?
Does the manuscript restate established scientific or engineering principles instead of merely providing the appropriate reference to such principles?
5. Figures and Tables
Are the figures and tables clearly labeled, legible, and with appropriate captions?
Are the figures and tables relevant, and referred to in the text?
Do the tables and figures show reduced rather than raw data?
Is the number of figures and tables appropriate?
6. Symbols, Acronyms, and Abbreviations
Are all nonstandard abbreviations and acronyms identified at first use?
Does the manuscript use proper and consistent symbols and abbreviations?
7. Length
Is the length of the manuscript appropriate for the amount and type of material presented? (Eight to 10 pages is the suggested length of a “standard” manuscript. If the manuscript is longer than this, is that additional length necessary to develop and explain the material? If it is not, please suggest areas where material could be eliminated.)
8. Appropriateness
Is the work of an archival nature (e.g., not just test results on a part that will be obsolete in a couple of years, or analysis of a particular design without illustration of generally applicable principles, or description of the characteristics of a particular test facility, or an account of the existence and characteristics of a specific commercial product, etc.)?
Is the work a good “fit” for the Transactions on Nuclear Science, and of interest to its readership?
Is this work overall appropriate for publication in the Transactions on Nuclear Science?